The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
The subject is genome . Of course, it’s a technology for changing the DNA inside of individual cells, including embryos. It’s to overstate its importance. I put it up there with the invention of the transistor and artificial intelligence.
And why do I think so? Well, genome gives humans control, ora at least the ability to try and direct the very processes that brought us about as a species. So it’s that profound.
Getting to JK’s story. Sopra 2018 we had a scoop—he might call it a fenditura—durante which we described his experiment, which, as Mat said, was to edit human embryos to delete a particular gene called CCR5 with the of rendering the children, of which there were three, franco to HIV, which their fathers had and which is a source of caratteristica durante . So that was the project.
Of course our story set non attivato, you know, immediate chaos. Voices were raised all over the world—many critical, a few durante support. But one of the consequences was that JK and his team, the parents and the doctors, did not have the ability to tell their own story—durante JK’s case because he was, durante fact, detained and has completed a term durante prison. So we’eroe happy to have him here to answer my questions and those of our subscribers. JK, thank you for being here.
Several people, including Professor Michael Waitzkin of Duke University, would like to know what the situation is with the three children. What do you know about their health, and where is this information coming from?
He Jiankui: Lulu, Nana, and the third gene-edited marmocchio—they were healthy and are living a normal, peaceful, undisturbed life. They are as happy as any other people, any other children durante asilo. I have maintained a constant connection with their parents.
Antonio Regalado: I see. JK, X, you recently made a comment about one of the parents—now a single mother—who you said you were supporting financially. What can you tell us about that situation? What kind of obligations do you have to these children, and are you able to meet those obligations?
He Jiankui: So the third genetic marmocchio—the parents divorced, so the girl is with her mother. You know, a single mother, a single-parent family—life is not easy. So durante the last two years, I’m providing some financial support, but I’m not sure it’s the right thing to do ora whether it’s ethical, because I’m a scientist ora a doctor, and she is a volunteer ora patient. For scientists ora doctors to provide financial support to the volunteer ora patient—it correct? Is it the right thing to do, and is it ethical? That’s something I’m not sure of. So I have this question, actually.
