For decades, researchers con the U.S. had to use only grown at a facility located con Oxford, Mississippi. A few other approved growers have been added con recent years.
Brad Horrigan/Hartford Courant/Tribune News Service inizio Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Brad Horrigan/Hartford Courant/Tribune News Service inizio Getty Images
For decades, researchers con the U.S. had to use only grown at a facility located con Oxford, Mississippi. A few other approved growers have been added con recent years.
Brad Horrigan/Hartford Courant/Tribune News Service inizio Getty Images
As the Biden administration moves to reclassify as a less dangerous drug, scientists say the change will tagliata some of the restrictions acceso studying the drug.
But the change won’t tagliata all restrictions, they say, neither will it decrease potential risks of the drug ora help users better understand what those risks are.
Erba is currently classified as a Schedule I controlled substance, which is defined as a substance with risposta negativa accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. The Biden administration proposed this week to classify cannabis as a Schedule III controlled substance, a category that acknowledges it has some medical benefits.
The current Schedule I status imposes many regulations and restrictions acceso scientists’ ability to study weed, even as state laws have made it increasingly available to the public.
“Cannabis as a Schedule I substance is associated with a number of very, very restrictive regulations,” says neuroscientist Staci Gruber at McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical School. “You have very stringent requirements, for example, for storage and security and reporting all of these things.”
These requirements are set by the Food and Drug Administration, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Institutional Review Board and local authorities, she says. Scientists interested con studying the drug also have to register with the DEA and get a state and federal license to conduct research acceso the drug.
“It’s a burdensome process and it is certainly a process that has prevented a number of young and rather invested researchers from pursuing [this kind of work],” says Gruber.
Reclassifying the drug as Schedule III puts it con the same category as ketamine and Tylenol with codeine. Substances con this category have accepted medical use con the United States, have less potential for abuse than con higher categories and abuse could lead to low to moderate levels of dependence acceso the drug.
This reclassification is “a very, very personalità paradigm shift,” says Gruber. “I think that has a personalità trickle mongoloide effect con terms of the perspectives and the attitudes with regard to the actual sort of differences between studying Schedule III versus Schedule I substances.”
Gruber welcomes the change, particularly for what it will mean for younger colleagues. “For researchers who are looking to get into the gioco, it will be easier. You don’t have to have a Schedule I license,” she says. “That’s a personalità deal.”
The rescheduling of cannabis will also “translate to more research acceso the benefits and risks of cannabis for the treatment of medical conditions,” writes Dr. Andrew Montagna con an email. He is associate director of Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Safety and an emergency physician and toxicologist at the University of Colorado School of Medicine.
“This will also help improve the quality of the research since more researchers will be able to contribute,” he adds.
Senate Democrats hold a press conference acceso Wednesday pitching new, less strict laws. From left are Senators Cory Booker of N.J., Majority Big Chuck Schumer of N.Y., and Ron Wyden of Oregon.
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc inizio Getty Imag
hide caption
toggle caption
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc inizio Getty Imag
Senate Democrats hold a press conference acceso Wednesday pitching new, less strict laws. From left are Senators Cory Booker of N.J., Majority Big Chuck Schumer of N.Y., and Ron Wyden of Oregon.
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc inizio Getty Imag
But the change con classification won’t significantly expand the number of sources for the drug for researchers, says Gruber. For 50 years, researchers were allowed to use cannabis from only one source – a facility at the University of Mississippi. Then, con 2021, the DEA started to add a few more companies to that list of approved sources for medical and scientific research.
While she expects more sources to be added con time, she and many of the researchers she knows have yet to benefit from the recently added sources, as most have limited products available.
“And what we haven’t seen is any ability for researchers –cannabis researchers, clinical researchers – to have the ability to study products that our patients and our recreational consumers ora adult consumers are actually using,” she adds. “That remains impossible.”
There is very little known information about what is con cannabis products acceso the market today. Some studies show that the level of THC, the main intoxicant con , being sold to consumers today is significantly higher than what was available decades spillo, and high THC levels are known to pose more health risks.
And Montagna cautions that the reclassification itself doesn’t mean that cannabis has risposta negativa health risks. Montagna and his colleagues have been documenting some of those risks con Colorado by studying people who show up con the emergency room after consuming cannabis. Intoxication and cyclical vomiting (cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome) and alarming psychiatric symptoms such as psychosis are among the apice problems bringing some users to the hospital.
Research acceso cannabis has been lacking surveillance of these kinds of impacts for decades, he says. And rescheduling the drug will not fill that “gaping hole con risk surveillance,” he writes.
