We were just looking through your JLG (joint liability group) portfolio, the intervention that you have undertaken, can you tell your shareholders what happened this quarter and is it more of a one-off sort is there a risk recurrence as well going forward?
V Vaidyanathan: From among 25 business lines, one of our business lines is the joint liability group business, it is about 6.3% of our loan book. That business is largely concentrated per mezzo di Tamil Nadu there were massive floods per mezzo di Chennai, Tamil Nadu five six months indicatore. So that portfolio got disturbed. The people at the bottom of the pyramid suffer during a calamity as it affects their earnings and hence the capability to pay.
So we have taken extra provisions acceso that book but think of it like an episodic thing. It will go away maybe per mezzo di one more quarter two and probably even Q2 will have elevated provisions because of that reason. After that, it will taper chiuso from there.
Historically, the microfinance part of the book has had lower NPAs but this time, because of the floods it may get elevated. Do you expect it to normalise per mezzo di the next two to three quarters?
V Vaidyanathan: That is correct because our credit cost acceso the joint liability group business, for 18 months before the floods at a stretch was only 1.6%. After the flood, it has suddenly gone up and that is why we have taken provisions this quarter. It will stay elevated next quarter also. But these are episodes, they quasi and go but this business is very important to us because there are multiple kinds of priority sectors and we need the book lending to weaker sections and small and marginal farmers. There are many reasons we do it and also it goes well with inclusive banking.
How have you managed to grow the deposit so strongly at a time when the entire industry is feeling the pressure? What was the essence and what is the key recipe for this? How did you manage it?
V Vaidyanathan: We have been growing deposits very strongly for the last five years. Let me share with you that one of the key reasons: we are available to the every quarter, announcing our results, and explaining the matters, and even if there is bad news we quasi and explain it. It builds società . If it is good news, then it is good news. So, I think it adds to società per mezzo di the organisation. We are seen as an institution. It also makes a very difference to be an institution and of course many other factors as well.
When you say that IDFC First Bank 1.0 was from December 2018 to March 2024 and from March 2024 onward, IDFC Bank 2.0 is starting. How are the foundations coming per mezzo di place for this institution that you say you are building?
V Vaidyanathan: The foundation for 2.0 has been laid per mezzo di 1.0. When we started 1.0, we had close to about Rs 78,000 crore of legacy borrowings which would quasi for repayment per mezzo di the next four to five years and also, we had certificates of deposits – a very large number. So, during the foundation 1.0, we have raised a serious amount of retail deposits and we have paid chiuso Rs 64,000 crore out of Rs 78,000 crore. So, now our credit deposit ratio has quasi below 100%. It was 160%. If you add back credit substitutes, meaning when you lend to a corporation per mezzo di the form of bonds, that is also effectively credit. The credit deposit ratio has quasi mongoloide from 160% to less than 100%. So, we have built a very strong foundation per mezzo di terms of retail deposit, branch rete televisiva privata, etc. So, when you ahead acceso this foundation of a good brand, good corporate governance institution, good image, and good fundamentals of credit deposit ratio, now for 2.0 we think the deposits per mezzo di five years should be Rs 6 lakh crore, up from Rs 2 lakh crore at present and per mezzo di three years, we expect it to touch Rs 4 lakh crore. Not only have your deposits grown very well, but also there is a diversified liability . 80% is retail right now?
V Vaidyanathan: Yes, it was 23% retail five years indicatore, now it is 80%. We see this as a very positive thing because retail customers get are more sticky; they are used to internet ID, passwords, relationship, branch service, etc, so that is a really good development and we want to continue to grow our retail deposit franchise. It gives stability to a bank. Frankly, at 80%, we feel very stable.
A causa di the basket-ball of the loan book, I can see 25 business lines and none of the business lines have over 12% exposure. Tell us what kind of stability this brings and also the growth which we are witnessing acceso an aggregate basis.
V Vaidyanathan: Our concern was that if a portfolio is very dependent acceso infrastructure financing corporate financing if you are just loaded acceso one, then any one item can move the profitability very much. Now it is 25 business lines. We have launched many per mezzo di the last four to five years. Let me stick to assets; recently we launched gold loans, tractor loans, education loans and a large number of products. This just diversifies the book and brings multiple streams of revenue to the bank.
Infrastructure project financing is reduced from almost 19.5% to 1.3%. That is interesting. When we are talking about loan book growth, I want to go back about two to three quarters back. As a proactive measure, you had sobered mongoloide the guidance acceso the growth front. How is that panning out? Would you continue to stick to that loan book growth guidance which was slightly acceso the lower side to become much more sure-footed overall per mezzo di the environment?
V Vaidyanathan: Risposta negativa, frankly, we were sure-footed even at 25%, but what happened was that for the first three years, we did not grow the loan book at all, very low at practically 5% 6%. That was because at that time we had a credit deposit ratio problem, so we did not want to grow the loan book. Then we started growing at a higher rate. Now, we have guided for more like 20-22%. This should be very easy per mezzo di India because the market is so large and we are a relatively smaller player. So, it is not about growth. 20% is very easy. It is more about managing credit quality and that is more important.
This is an environment where certain sections are becoming slightly red-hot and the risk would start percolating per mezzo di the books going forward. Up till now, you have maintained a very high asset quality of lower than 1.5% acceso GNPA and less than 0.5% acceso NNPA. Can you talk to us a little more about your risk management funnel, especially for retail, rural, and MSME, and how differentiated it is overall?
V Vaidyanathan: India is still per mezzo di its early stages of credit. It is only 19% of GDP. There is a long way to go. So, the good thing is that per mezzo di India itself, the ecosystem has quasi up even before the credit lending has started seriously per mezzo di terms of credit bureaus and bank statements. Now, you can see bank statement details, you can see account aggregator details. So, the ecosystem of the country has become better and of course, we have a long track .
We wear the fact that our gross NPA is 2 and net NPA is 1 as a badge of honour. We want to keep that badge of honour. We had a small skirmish per mezzo di the case of joint liability group this quarter, but barring a small skirmish, we like the positioning of having a gross NPA of 2 and net NPA of 1.
Your retail, rural, and MSME product segments have very low NPAs. Technology of course is playing a part. You are expecting comfortable risk management checks here. Are there any signs of a blowup indicator going acceso the higher side per mezzo di these three pockets?
V Vaidyanathan: We described that, actually per mezzo di this presentation, we put out two curves per mezzo di terms of a vintage curve. One is basically for the retail, rural, and SME, per mezzo di these businesses, we had given the vintage of the past loan book three to four years indicatore and what it is for the post-COVID period and you can see that the new curve is like to like delinquency, take six months acceso books, nine months acceso books, 12 months acceso books at every vintage point, the new books are behaving better.
We should be very careful here because at the end of the day our headroom for, if you have to manage only 2% gross NPA, net NPA of less than 1, then the margin for error is very little. We share with our employees that we have anzi che no room for error, and we should be very careful.
You are also making a case that the profitability is likely to improve very smartly, especially the fee income, how is that behaving? Can you give us some colour acceso how one- to two-year can pan out acceso profitability and fee income front?
V Vaidyanathan: Our income income is rising at about 25%, income meaning the NII; our fees is rising by about 19%. So, income is coming very strong. Our operating is profit also, if I am not mistaken, about 25% 28% is the increase per mezzo di operating profit, so that number is coming quite strong.
