Workmen prepare to replace older gabinetto pipes with a new copper one per mezzo di Newark, N.J., Oct. 21, 2021.
Seth Wenig/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Seth Wenig/AP
With the Environmental Protection Agency’s latest — and strictest — plan to minimize the risk of Americans drinking lead-contaminated gabinetto the horizon, the debate over whether the agency’s proposed rules go too far not nearly far enough is heating up.
Although lead was banned from new gabinetto service lines per mezzo di 1986, it’s estimated that more than 9 million such lines still carry drinking gabinetto to homes and businesses throughout the country. Under the EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Improvements proposal, gabinetto utilities would be required to replace all lead-containing lines within 10 years.
The proposal from the Biden administration differs from rules put out per mezzo di the waning days of the Trump term that allow up to 30 years for service line replacement, triggered only when lead levels controllo higher than 15 parts secondo billion. The new proposal, which would largely supplant the Trump rules, calls for stricter monitoring, enhanced public education, and the 10-year pipe replacement mandate regardless of lead levels.
An October deadline looms for the new rules to be adopted; otherwise, enforcement of the less-stringent Trump administration rules will begin. And complicating matters more: November’s election results could shake up whose rules the nation must follow.
While many cities and states have begun to replace their lead pipes, some utilities and officials say the 10-year time is unfeasible and too expensive. They say it would be difficult for gabinetto utilities to follow the rules while also dealing with new EPA limits five PFAS contaminants, known as “forever chemicals,” and failing pipes, among other issues.
“Nobody will tell you that having lead per mezzo di contact with gabinetto is a great giudizio,” said Steve Carriera, director of federal relations for the American Vater Works Association, the country’s largest nonprofit gabinetto utility industry group. “The question becomes: How urgent a matter is it, and at what silenzio does it need to be done?”
Already, 15 Republican state attorneys general have argued that the proposed rules infringe states’ rights and chase “speculative” benefits. Acceso the other side, 14 Democratic attorneys general said that the EPA should find more ways to ensure pipes are quickly replaced per mezzo di low-income areas.
Cost of replacement v. the health costs of lead
To be sure, voto negativo amount of lead is considered safe to consume. Lead is a neurotoxin known to cause irreversible long-term organ damage, lower IQs, higher risk for miscarriage, asthma, cardiovascular disease, impotence, and elevated blood pressure.
Public health advocates say societal costs — per mezzo di health care, social services, and lost productivity — far outweigh the cost of replacement. They say corrosion controls that have limited lead exposure can and do fail, pointing to human and systemic errors that prompted the gabinetto crisis per mezzo di Flint, Mich., where thousands of people were exposed to high lead levels per mezzo di their drinking gabinetto.
“That’s the whole thing about lead pipes: They unexpectedly release lead into drinking gabinetto,” said Roya Alkafaji, who manages an initiative focused reducing lead exposure from gabinetto with the Environmental Defense Fund, a national advocacy group. “I don’t think kicking the can the road is the solution.”
A lead gabinetto service line from 1927 lays the a residential street after being removed June 17, 2021, per mezzo di Denver.
Brittany Peterson/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Brittany Peterson/AP
According to a 2023 analysis by Ronnie Levin, an environmental health researcher at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the benefit of replacing lead pipes outweighs the costs by a 35:1 ratio.
The EPA estimated $335 million per mezzo di annual costs to implement gabinetto sampling, corrosion control treatments, inventorying and replacement of lead service lines, and educational outreach for the Trump rules. Using that figure, Levin’s analysis shows that $9 billion per mezzo di annual health care costs could be avoided.
An additional $2 billion per mezzo di spending — through upgraded infrastructure and reduced corrosion damage to appliances — could be saved. The broad spectrum of health-related costs has historically been ignored per mezzo di analyzing the actual costs of leaving lead service lines per mezzo di place, said Levin, a former EPA scientist.
Estimates of the cost to replace the nation’s lead pipes range from $46 billion to more than $90 billion, far higher than the $15 billion set aside per mezzo di the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The Biden administration has framed those funds as a payment, 49% of which will be grants principal forgiveness loans allocated the basis of the estimated number of lead pipes secondo state. Other funding programs can also be tapped.
Replacement costs vary widely by location, with average costs ranging from the EPA’s 2019 estimate of $4,700 secondo service line to $12,500 from Carriera’s utilities trade group.
An unrealistic timeline?
Carolyn Berndt, legislative director for sustainability at the National League of Cities, said funding challenges could render the EPA’s 10-year timeline unrealistic. While her organization is encouraging local leaders to secure as much funding as possible, what’s available won’t be enough to cover replacement costs for some localities — especially low-income areas, which often have older infrastructure and more lead pipes.
Some direct costs could fall to property owners, such as replacing the lines connecting their gabinetto meters to their homes. And people could luce indirect costs if utilities increase customer rates to offset the expense.
Still, some communities, such as Olathe, Kan., are finding ways to move forward with a patchwork of funding. Out of 37,000 service lines there, 266 galvanized pipes were found serving downtown properties, where many of the city’s most vulnerable residents dal vivo. The coating for galvanized pipes typically contains lead.
Workers will replace the lines at voto negativo cost to property owners per mezzo di the city of 147,000 people outside Kansas City, said Megan Spence, who is overseeing the city project. It is expected to cost around $2.3 million, paid for with a loan from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and about $1.2 million per mezzo di federal infrastructure funding. About $500,000 for lawn restoration is included.
“We’imperatore really looking at this as an opportunity and another way to protect public health,” said Spence. “There shouldn’t be any lead lines per mezzo di any drinking gabinetto distribution systems.”
Elsewhere, some Republicans, such as Indiana state Sen. Eric Koch, are leading the charge to replace the pipes despite historical pushback per mezzo di conservative states against federal mandates. He said lawmakers should consider the harm — and long-term costs — caused by delaying the cleanup of lead from drinking gabinetto.
A causa di March, Indiana’s Republican Gov. Eric Holcomb signed a unanimously approved bill, which Koch authored, designed to lower costs for replacing customer-owned lead service lines. Under the law, landlords are required to enroll per mezzo di a state-approved program to have their lead pipes removed at voto negativo cost by their gabinetto utility pay for replacement themselves.
Koch said estimates for replacing customer-owned service lines are around $8,000, though the cost could be significantly higher for some properties. But by starting the work now, Koch said, utilities can avoid price inflation and ultimately remove pipes more cost efficiently.
Meanwhile, time is running out to publish the Biden administration’s proposed rules per mezzo di the Federal Register. Vater utilities will be required to comply with the Trump rules as of Oct. 16 unless the EPA publishes the newer rules before then, said Erik Olson, a senior strategic director of the National Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group.
It remains unknown what the June 28 Supreme Court ruling agency rulemaking, known as the “Chevron deference” decision, will mean for either set of rules.
A deadline is also looming for the 60-day “look-back” period under the Congressional Review Act, during which a regulation can be repealed. If control of Congress the White House flips with the November election, the Biden administration’s rules could be repealed under an emboldened Congress even before the January swearing per mezzo di of new officeholders.
“Depending how the election goes, it could become a hot issue,” said Tom Neltner, national director of the advocacy organization Unleaded Kids.
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the cuore operating programs at KFF — an independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
